Non-participating onlooker or expert?
Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Union Standard International Group Pty Ltd (Trial Ruling No 2) [2023] FCA 333 In this case, the Court found that
Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Union Standard International Group Pty Ltd (Trial Ruling No 2) [2023] FCA 333 In this case, the Court found that
Strickland on behalf of the Maduwongga Claim Group v State of Western Australia [2023] FCA 270 In this case, the Court made observations regarding an
Sanofi v Amgen Inc [2023] FCA 264 In this case, though the court observed that experimental evidence can be expensive and time consuming, with the
Whilst courts are empowered to exclude prejudiced expert reports, parties may nonetheless advise experts on proper reporting practices and case theories. We examine comments by Justice Riordan
Does a history of giving evidence for or against a plaintiff/defendant rule an expert witness as partisan? The issue recently arose in the Monsanto Class
In Long v IS Industry Fund Ptd Ltd (No 2) [2020] NSWSC 1541, the NSW Supreme Court addressed complaints of irrelevance and prejudice levelled at an expert
singapore
Level 42, Six Battery Road
Singapore 049909
©2024 - ExpertsDirect
Made with love by Studio 21