Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Union Standard International Group Pty Ltd (Trial Ruling No 2) [2023] FCA 333 In this case, the Court found that
![Strickland on behalf of the Maduwongga Claim Group v State of Western Australia [2023] FCA 270](https://expertsdirect.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Strickland-on-behalf-of-the-Maduwongga-Claim-Group-v-State-of-Western-Australia-2023-FCA-270-900x603.jpg)
Strickland on behalf of the Maduwongga Claim Group v State of Western Australia [2023] FCA 270 In this case, the Court made observations regarding an
![Sanofi v Amgen Inc [2023] FCA 264](https://expertsdirect.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Sanofi-v-Amgen-Inc-2023-FCA-264-900x603.jpg)
Sanofi v Amgen Inc [2023] FCA 264 In this case, though the court observed that experimental evidence can be expensive and time consuming, with the
Whilst courts are empowered to exclude prejudiced expert reports, parties may nonetheless advise experts on proper reporting practices and case theories. We examine comments by Justice Riordan
Does a history of giving evidence for or against a plaintiff/defendant rule an expert witness as partisan? The issue recently arose in the Monsanto Class
In Long v IS Industry Fund Ptd Ltd (No 2) [2020] NSWSC 1541, the NSW Supreme Court addressed complaints of irrelevance and prejudice levelled at an expert
