‘Impressive’ forensic lip-reader evidence ultimately unnecessary In Lehrmann v Network Ten Pty Limited (Expert Evidence) [2023] FCA 1577, the court ruled on the admissibility
Cho v Dayoub [2024] NSWDC 97 In this case, the court ruled on the effect of an expert’s reliance on a party’s accounts, and
When “new” evidence is not considered “fresh” Background The substantive proceeding is a native title determination application of a swathe of land and waters
Admissibility of expert evidence regarding controversial tweets Background Senator Mehreen Faruqi published a tweet in response to the death of Queen Elizabeth II in
Scenic Tours Pty Ltd v Moore [2023] NSWCA 74 In this case, an expert in the travel business was considered by the court to be problematic
Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Union Standard International Group Pty Ltd (Trial Ruling No 2) [2023] FCA 333 In this case, the Court found that
Strickland on behalf of the Maduwongga Claim Group v State of Western Australia [2023] FCA 270 In this case, the Court made observations regarding an
Sanofi v Amgen Inc [2023] FCA 264 In this case, though the court observed that experimental evidence can be expensive and time consuming, with the
singapore
Level 42, Six Battery Road
Singapore 049909
©2024 - ExpertsDirect
Made with love by Studio 21
