
Clarifications on Admissible and Inadmissible Expert Evidence
Sanrus Pty Ltd & Ors v Monto Coal 2 Pty Ltd & Ors (No 8) [2019] QSC 255 concerned proceedings that Sanrus Pty Ltd brought
The experts in sourcing experts. ExpertsDirect is an ultra-niche company whose specialised knowledge is sourcing preeminent expert witnesses for litigation
Strengthening Legal Cases with Expert Insights. Stay informed and prepared with ExpertsDirect Resources—your go-to hub for expert witness training, CPD programs, industry insights, and professional events
The experts in sourcing experts. ExpertsDirect is an ultra-niche company whose specialised knowledge is sourcing preeminent expert witnesses for litigation

Sanrus Pty Ltd & Ors v Monto Coal 2 Pty Ltd & Ors (No 8) [2019] QSC 255 concerned proceedings that Sanrus Pty Ltd brought

Although expert evidence is made exempt from the Opinion Rule by Section 79 of the Evidence Act (NSW) 1995, it is still subject to the

In an age of growing demand for expedient and high-risk cosmetic procedures, we may see an influx of negligence claims soon, if not already. Where

When two experts present evidence, courts may choose to rely on the stronger report. In some instances, however, courts may appoint their own expert witness.

It is a growing trend for letters of instruction to be dated to be contemporaneous with the completion of an expert witness report. In this case, comments were made suggesting that this practice should be avoided.

This case is a timely reminder of the impact that a thorough expert, who explores and considers all avenues of relevant information, can have on a case.