
A late expert report and questions of expertise raised in the Lehrmann defamation trial
Lehrmann v Network Ten Pty Limited (Expert Evidence) [2023] FCA 1577 In this case, the court ruled on the admissibility of an expert report of
The experts in sourcing experts. ExpertsDirect is an ultra-niche company whose specialised knowledge is sourcing preeminent expert witnesses for litigation
Strengthening Legal Cases with Expert Insights. Stay informed and prepared with ExpertsDirect Resources—your go-to hub for expert witness training, CPD programs, industry insights, and professional events
The experts in sourcing experts. ExpertsDirect is an ultra-niche company whose specialised knowledge is sourcing preeminent expert witnesses for litigation

Lehrmann v Network Ten Pty Limited (Expert Evidence) [2023] FCA 1577 In this case, the court ruled on the admissibility of an expert report of

Palmanova Pty Ltd v Commonwealth of Australia [2023] FCA 1391 In this case, an expert’s report was challenged on the basis she did not have

Anderson v Yongpairojwong [2023] NSWSC 1359 In this case, the court considered the weight to be given to evidence of expert physicians who had not

Stradford (a pseudonym) v Judge Vasta (No 2) [2023] FCA 1364 In this “unique and unusual” case, the court weighed in on whether a party

Ghorbanzadeh v Western Sydney Local Health District [2023] NSWSC 1330 In this case, the court considered whether handwritten notes made by an expert which he

Davis v Perry O’Brien Engineering Pty Ltd [2023] QSC 243 In this case, the methodology employed by a valuation expert, together with his personal friendship